In an experiment aimed to disprove Einstein's photoelectric equation,how did Millikan prove it?

Vedclass pdf generator app on play store
Vedclass iOS app on app store
(N/A) Einstein's photoelectric equation is given by:
$\frac{1}{2} m v_{\max }^{2} = h \nu - \phi_{0}$
Since the maximum kinetic energy is related to the stopping potential $V_{0}$ by the relation:
$\frac{1}{2} m v_{\max }^{2} = e V_{0}$
Substituting this into the photoelectric equation,we get:
$e V_{0} = h \nu - \phi_{0}$
Rearranging for $V_{0}$:
$V_{0} = \left( \frac{h}{e} \right) \nu - \frac{\phi_{0}}{e}$
This equation is of the form $y = mx + c$,representing a straight line where the slope is $\frac{h}{e}$.
Millikan performed a series of experiments measuring the stopping potential $V_{0}$ for different frequencies $\nu$ of incident radiation. He plotted a graph of $V_{0}$ versus $\nu$,which resulted in a straight line. The slope of this line was found to be $\frac{h}{e}$.
By using the known value of the elementary charge $e$,Millikan calculated the value of Planck's constant $h$ to be approximately $6.626 \times 10^{-34} \text{ Js}$,which matched the previously accepted value.
Thus,while Millikan initially intended to disprove Einstein's theory,his experimental results provided strong evidence for its validity,confirming the photoelectric equation with great precision across various alkali metals.

Explore More

Similar Questions

$A$ and $B$ are two metals with threshold frequencies $1.8 \times 10^{14} \ Hz$ and $2.2 \times 10^{14} \ Hz$. Two identical photons of energy $0.825 \ eV$ each are incident on them. Then photoelectrons are emitted by (Take $h = 6.6 \times 10^{-34} \ J \cdot s$)

$A$ photoemissive substance is illuminated with a radiation of wavelength $\lambda_i$ so that it releases electrons with de-Broglie wavelength $\lambda_e$. The longest wavelength of radiation that can emit photoelectron is $\lambda_0$. The expression for the de-Broglie wavelength $\lambda_e$ is ($m = \text{mass of electron}$, $h = \text{Planck's constant}$, $c = \text{speed of light}$):

Why can wave theory not explain the change in the kinetic energy of an electron with a change in the frequency of incident light?

Let $K_1$ be the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons emitted by light of wavelength $\lambda_1$ and $K_2$ be the maximum kinetic energy corresponding to wavelength $\lambda_2$. If $\lambda_1 = 2\lambda_2$,then:

$A$ photoelectric surface is illuminated successively by monochromatic light of wavelengths $\lambda$ and $\lambda/2$. If the maximum kinetic energy of the emitted photoelectrons in the second case is three times that in the first case,the work function of the surface is

Difficult
View Solution

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo